Summary. The European Credit Transfer System (ECTS) estimates the academic workload of students in EU countries in terms of time they spend both in and out of class on university work. The aim of this study was to quantify, based on students’ estimates of their weekly schedule, the workload placed upon them in classes using the flipped learning methodology and formative models of assessment. To this end, this study made use of longitudinal design over the course of a semester. The participants were 75 students (19.8 ±3.48 years old) enrolled in the first year of a degree program in the Science of Sport and Physical Activity. Using a previously validated instrument, students recorded weekly estimates of their workload. The results show that the students devoted an average of 2.20 ±0.75 hours a week to their studies outside of class time. The student estimates were below the ECTS credit hour guidelines (–62.30%; p <0.000). The activities outside the classroom to which students devoted the greatest amount of time were preparation for practical sessions (43.4 ±25.5 minutes) and reading of materials (30.7 ±12.5 minutes) prior to in-person sessions. The article concludes that while the ECTS model represents a useful international standard, the EU guidelines overestimate the real workload, even when classes use more active teaching and learning methodologies. These standards are not a reflection of students’ actual workloads, and implementing them in real life would not be sustainable for students.
CITATION STYLE
Otero-Saborido, F. M., Palomino-Devia, C., Bernal-García, A., & Gálvez-González, J. (2020). The workload of university students in the context of Flipped Learning and formative assessment. Aloma, 38(2), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.51698/ALOMA.2020.38.2.33-40
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.