Hylan gf-20 viscosupplementation in the treatment osymptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee: Clinical effect survivorship at 5 years

20Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: Controversies remain surrounding the choice of hyaluronic acid products and patient selection. A study was conducted to report the long-term survivorship of intra-articular injection effect of high molecular weight hyaluronic preparation hylan GF-20 (Synvisc-One) for patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Materials and Methods: A retrospective observational analysis of a single therapeutic series was carried out. The analysis was conducted to determine therapeutic effect survivorship taking arthroplasty and any other surgical interventions as endpoint results. Results: Seventy-seven consecutive patients (82 knees) were followed up for five years. At one-year follow-up, 71 knees (87%) responded to treatment and only 8 knees (10%) were offered arthroplasty due to persistence of symptoms. At five-year follow-up, 41 (50%) were still considered responders. During the study period, repeat injection was given in 9 knees (11%). Arthroplasty (either total or unicompartmental) was required in 26 (31%). Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis of therapeutic effect demonstrated 67% survival at 5 years with arthroplasty as endpoint and 58% survival at 5 years with all secondary interventions as endpoint. Conclusions: This study demonstrates a significantly longer duration of clinical benefit of hylan GF-20 injection. Present results may suggest a notion of an ideal delay therapeutic strategy for patients not ready to receive an arthroplasty. Further studies will be required to help characterise these subsets of patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boutefnouchet, T., Puranik, G., Holmes, E., & Bell, K. M. (2017). Hylan gf-20 viscosupplementation in the treatment osymptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee: Clinical effect survivorship at 5 years. Knee Surgery and Related Research, 29(2), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.5792/ksrr.16.061

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free