There Is No 'Virtual Learning': The Materiality of Digital Education

65Citations
Citations of this article
197Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Te distinction between face-to-face and distant digitally-mediated educational engagement is a complex one, and the two modes are ofen combined in practice, via ‘blended learning’ or the use of a VLE to support campus-based teaching. Te current Covid-19 pandemic has thrown this distinction into relief, in a context where educationalists have been forced to move to fully distant engagement in a very short timeframe. Tis paper explores how this predicament has brought to the fore the nature of our engagement with digital knowledge practices and screen-based communication, arguing that the notion of‘virtual learning’ is a fawed one. Instead, adopting a sociomaterial perspective, it argues that all aspects of digital engagement are in fact grounded in material and embodied entanglements with devices and other artefacts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gourlay, L. (2021). There Is No “Virtual Learning”: The Materiality of Digital Education. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 10(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.7821/NAER.2021.1.649

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free