Effects of systematic oral care in critically ill patients: A multicenter study

73Citations
Citations of this article
171Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: No standard oral assessment tools are available for determining frequency of oral care in critical care patients, and the method of providing oral care is controversial. Objectives: To examine the effects of a systematic program of oral care on oral assessment scores in critically ill intubated and nonintubated, patients. Methods: Clinical data were collected 3 times during critical care admissions before and after institution of a systematic program of oral care in 3 different medical centers. The oral care education program consisted of instruction from a dentist or dental hygienist and a clear procedure outlining systematic oral care. The Beck Oral Assessment Scale and the mucosalplaque score were used to assess the oral cavity. Data were analyzed by using linear mixed modeling with controls for severity of illness. Results: Scores on the Beck Scale differed significantly (F = 4.79, P = .01) in the pattern of scores across the 3 days and between the control group (before oral education) and the systematic oral care group. Unlike the control group, the treatment group had decreasing scores on the Beck Scale from day 1 to day 5. The mucosal-plaque score and the Beck Scale scores had strong correlations throughout the study; the highest correlation was on day 5 (r = 0.798, P < .001, n = 43). Conclusions: Oral assessment scores improved after nurses implemented a protocol for systematic oral care. Use of the Beck Scale and the mucosal-plaque score could standardize oral assessment and guide nurses in providing oral interventions. © 2011 American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

References Powered by Scopus

APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system

14574Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Periodontal disease in pregnancy II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition

5872Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Chlorhexidine gluconate 0.12% oral rinse reduces the incidence of total nosocomial respiratory infection and nonprophylactic systemic antibiotic use in patients undergoing heart surgery

403Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Effect of oral chlorhexidine de-adoption and implementation of an oral care bundle on mortality for mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit (CHORAL): a multi-center stepped wedge cluster-randomized controlled trial

56Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Oral and Gut Bacterial Microbiomes: Similarities, Differences, and Connections

55Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Implementation strategies used to implement nursing guidelines in daily practice: A systematic review

51Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ames, N. J., Sulima, P., Yates, J. M., McCullagh, L., Gollins, S. L., Soeken, K., & Wallen, G. R. (2011). Effects of systematic oral care in critically ill patients: A multicenter study. American Journal of Critical Care, 20(5). https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2011359

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 51

60%

Lecturer / Post doc 13

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 11

13%

Researcher 10

12%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 56

52%

Nursing and Health Professions 45

42%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

4%

Social Sciences 2

2%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free