Deep learning-based residual control chart for binary response

5Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A residual (r) control chart of asymmetrical and non-normal binary response variable with highly correlated explanatory variables is proposed in this research. To avoid multicollinearity between multiple explanatory variables, we employ and compare a neural network regression model and deep learning regression model using Bayesian variable selection (BVS), principal component analysis (PCA), nonlinear PCA (NLPCA) or whole multiple explanatory variables. The advantage of our r control chart is able to process both non-normal and correlated multivariate explanatory variables by employing a neural network model and deep learning model. We prove that the deep learning r control chart is relatively efficient to monitor the simulated and real binary response asymmetric data compared with r control chart of the generalized linear model (GLM) with probit and logit link functions and neural network r control chart.

References Powered by Scopus

Deep learning

64791Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Nonlinear Component Analysis as a Kernel Eigenvalue Problem

6884Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Basic concepts of artificial neural network (ANN) modeling and its application in pharmaceutical research

1480Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Deep learning-based residual control chart for count data

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Surveillance of high-yield processes using deep learning models

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Albatross analytics a hands-on into practice: statistical and data science application

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, J. M., & Ha, I. D. (2021). Deep learning-based residual control chart for binary response. Symmetry, 13(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13081389

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘2300.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

50%

Researcher 1

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 1

33%

Mathematics 1

33%

Engineering 1

33%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0