Trying to break new ground in aerial archaeology

25Citations
Citations of this article
69Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aerial reconnaissance continues to be a vital tool for landscape-oriented archaeological research. Although a variety of remote sensing platforms operate within the earth's atmosphere, the majority of aerial archaeological information is still derived from oblique photographs collected during observer-directed reconnaissance flights, a prospection approach which has dominated archaeological aerial survey for the past century. The resulting highly biased imagery is generally catalogued in sub-optimal (spatial) databases, if at all, after which a small selection of images is orthorectified and interpreted. For decades, this has been the standard approach. Although many innovations, including digital cameras, inertial units, photogrammetry and computer vision algorithms, geographic(al) information systems and computing power have emerged, their potential has not yet been fully exploited in order to re-invent and highly optimise this crucial branch of landscape archaeology. The authors argue that a fundamental change is needed to transform the way aerial archaeologists approach data acquisition and image processing. By addressing the very core concepts of geographically biased aerial archaeological photographs and proposing new imaging technologies, data handling methods and processing procedures, this paper gives a personal opinion on how the methodological components of aerial archaeology, and specifically aerial archaeological photography, should evolve during the next decade if developing a more reliable record of our past is to be our central aim. In this paper, a possible practical solution is illustrated by outlining a turnkey aerial prospection system for total coverage survey together with a semi-automated back-end pipeline that takes care of photograph correction and image enhancement as well as the management and interpretative mapping of the resulting data products. In this way, the proposed system addresses one of many bias issues in archaeological research: the bias we impart to the visual record as a result of selective coverage. While the total coverage approach outlined here may not altogether eliminate survey bias, it can vastly increase the amount of useful information captured during a single reconnaissance flight while mitigating the discriminating effects of observer-based, on-the-fly target selection. Furthermore, the information contained in this paper should make it clear that with current technology it is feasible to do so. This can radically alter the basis for aerial prospection and move landscape archaeology forward, beyond the inherently biased patterns that are currently created by airborne archaeological prospection.

References Powered by Scopus

Relationships between leaf chlorophyll content and spectral reflectance and algorithms for non-destructive chlorophyll assessment in higher plant leaves

1980Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The interpretation of structure from motion.

952Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Signature analysis of leaf reflectance spectra: Algorithm development for remote sensing of chlorophyll

720Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Airborne and spaceborne remote sensing for archaeological and cultural heritage applications: A review of the century (1907–2017)

222Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Recent trends and long-standing problems in archaeological remote sensing

107Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Documentation of archaeology-specific workflow for airborne LiDAR data processing

51Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Verhoeven, G., & Sevara, C. (2016). Trying to break new ground in aerial archaeology. Remote Sensing, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8110918

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 29

53%

Researcher 18

33%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

9%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Arts and Humanities 17

40%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 11

26%

Social Sciences 8

19%

Engineering 7

16%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 12

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free