Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis using a locking compression plate for distal femoral fractures.

38Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

To evaluate treatment outcomes of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) for distal femoral fractures in 31 patients. 22 male and 9 female consecutive patients aged 21 to 65 (mean, 42) years underwent minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis using a locking compression plate (LCP) for distal femoral fractures. The causes of injury were vehicular accidents (n=24), falls (n=6), and assault (n=1). According to the AO classification, the fractures were classified as types A1 (n=10), A2 (n=7), and A3 (n=14). Most fractures were closed; 3 were Gustilo type-II fractures. Clinical and functional outcomes were assessed using the Knee Society Scores. The mean operating time was 70 (range, 60-100) minutes. The mean length of hospital stay was 9 (6-14) days. The mean time to union was 3.7 (range, 2.8-4.6) months. The mean follow-up period was 18 (14-26) months. At the one-year follow-up, 29 of the patients had good or excellent outcomes. No patient had angular or rotational deformity of >10o. One osteoporotic woman with a type-A1 fracture had implant failure at 10 weeks and underwent revision surgery. Another patient with a type-A1 fracture had persistent pain on the lateral aspect of the distal thigh and underwent implant removal at 22 months. No patient developed deep infection, malunion or nonunion. MIPO using a LCP achieves favourable biological fixation for distal femoral fractures with few complications. Bone grafting is not needed even in cases of metaphyseal comminution. Proper patient selection and preoperative planning are essential to prevent complications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nayak, R. M., Koichade, M. R., Umre, A. N., & Ingle, M. V. (2011). Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis using a locking compression plate for distal femoral fractures. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery (Hong Kong), 19(2), 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901101900211

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free