Nineteenth-century medical practitioners objected that Continental vivisection displays were cruel, unnecessary, and gave their profession a bad name. After the first law to protect animals was passed, anti-cruelty campaigners formed organisations such as the RSPCA to prosecute acts of brutality, which they thought tended to promote a culture of violence, but they allowed medics to self-regulate as their moral integrity was assumed to be irreproachable. Once the Vivisection Act came into force, however, the public became concerned about the readiness with which licenses were issued.
CITATION STYLE
Bates, A. W. H. (2017). Vivisection, Virtue, and the Law in the Nineteenth Century. In Palgrave Macmillan Animal Ethics Series (Vol. Part F1886, pp. 13–41). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55697-4_2
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.