Selective classifiers can be too restrictive: A case-study in oesophageal cancer

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Real-life datasets in biomedicine often include missing values. When learning a Bayesian network classifier from such a dataset, the missing values are typically filled in by means of an imputation method to arrive at a complete dataset. The thus completed dataset then is used for the classifier's construction. When learning a selective classifier, also the selection of appropriate features is based upon the completed data. The resulting classifier, however, is likely to be used in the original real-life setting where it is again confronted with missing values. By means of a real-life dataset in the field of oesophageal cancer that includes a relatively large number of missing values, we argue that especially the wrapper approach to feature selection may result in classifiers that are too selective for such a setting and that, in fact, some redundancy is required to arrive at a reasonable classification accuracy in practice. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Blanco, R., Van Der Gaag, L. C., Inza, I., & Larrañaga, P. (2004). Selective classifiers can be too restrictive: A case-study in oesophageal cancer. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 3337, 212–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30547-7_22

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free