Ups and downs in catch-up saccades following single-pulse TMS-methodological considerations

1Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can interfere with smooth pursuit or with saccades initiated from a fixed position toward a fixed target, but little is known about the effect of TMS on catch-up saccade made to assist smooth pursuit. Here we explored the effect of TMS on catch-up saccades by means of a situation in which the moving target was driven by an external agent, or moved by the participants' hand, a condition known to decrease the occurrence of catch-up saccade. Two sites of stimulation were tested, the vertex and M1 hand area. Compared to conditions with no TMS, we found a consistent modulation of saccadic activity after TMS such that it decreased at 40-100ms, strongly resumed at 100- 160ms, and then decreased at 200-300ms. Despite this modulatory effect, the accuracy of catch-up saccade was maintained, and the mean saccadic activity over the 0-300ms period remained unchanged. Those findings are discussed in the context of studies showing that single-pulse TMS can induce widespread effects on neural oscillations as well as perturbations in the latency of saccades during reaction time protocols. At a more general level, despite challenges and interpretational limitations making uncertain the origin of this modulatory effect, our study provides direct evidence that TMS over presumably non-oculomotor regions interferes with the initiation of catch-up saccades, and thus offers methodological considerations for future studies that wish to investigate the underlying neural circuitry of catch-up saccades using TMS.

References Powered by Scopus

Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research

4205Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Optimal focal transcranial magnetic activation of the human motor cortex: Effects of coil orientation, shape of the induced current pulse, and stimulus intensity

531Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Magnetic brain stimulation with a double coil: the importance of coil orientation

412Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Non-invasive brain stimulation for osteoarthritis

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mathew, J., & Danion, F. R. (2018). Ups and downs in catch-up saccades following single-pulse TMS-methodological considerations. PLoS ONE, 13(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205208

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

73%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

18%

Researcher 1

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Neuroscience 6

55%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

18%

Psychology 2

18%

Computer Science 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0