Análisis de minimización de costes de abatacept subcut́aneo en el tratamiento de la artritis reumatoide en España

3Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To compare the cost of treating rheumatoid arthritis patients that have failed an initial treatment with methotrexate, with subcutaneous abatacept versus other first-line biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Method: Subcutaneous abatacept was considered comparable to intravenous abatacept, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab and tocilizumab, based on indirect comparison using mixed treatment analysis. A cost-minimization analysis was therefore considered appropriate. The Spanish Health System perspective and a 3 year time horizon were selected. Pharmaceutical and administration costs (€, 2013) of all available first-line biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs were considered. Administration costs were obtained from a local costs database. Patients were considered to have a weight of 70 kg. A 3% annual discount rate was applied. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: Subcutaneous abatacept proved in the base case to be less costly than all other biologic antirrheumatic drugs (ranging from € -831.42 to € -9,741.69 versus infliximab and tocilizumab, respectively). Subcutaneous abatacept was associated with a cost of € 10,760.41 per patient during the first year of treatment and € 10,261.29 in subsequent years. The total 3-year cost of subcutaneous abatacept was € 29,953.89 per patient. Sensitivity analyses proved the model to be robust. Subcutaneous abatacept remained cost-saving in 100% of probabilistic sensitivity analysis simulations versus adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept and golimumab, in more than 99.6% versus intravenous abatacept and tocilizumab and in 62.3% versus infliximab. Conclusions: Treatment with subcutaneous abatacept is cost-saving versus intravenous abatacept, adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab and tocilizumab in the management of rheumatoid arthritis patients initiating treatment with biological antirheumatic drugs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ariza, R., Van Walsem, A., Canal, C., Roldán, C., Betegón, L., Oyagüez, I., & Janssen, K. (2014). Análisis de minimización de costes de abatacept subcut́aneo en el tratamiento de la artritis reumatoide en España. Farmacia Hospitalaria, 38(4), 257–265. https://doi.org/10.7399/FH.2014.38.4.1137

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free