On a matching distance between rooted phylogenetic trees

45Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Robinson-Foulds (RF) distance is the most popular method of evaluating the dissimilarity between phylogenetic trees. In this paper, we define and explore in detail properties of the Matching Cluster (MC) distance, which can be regarded as a refinement of the RF metric for rooted trees. Similarly to RF, MC operates on clusters of compared trees, but the distance evaluation is more complex. Using the graph theoretic approach based on a minimum-weight perfect matching in bipartite graphs, the values of similarity between clusters are transformed to the final MC-score of the dissimilarity of trees. The analyzed properties give insight into the structure of the metric space generated by MC, its relations with the Matching Split (MS) distance of unrooted trees and asymptotic behavior of the expected distance between binary n-leaf trees selected uniformly in both MC and MS (T(n3/2)).

References Powered by Scopus

1892Citations
885Readers

Your institution provides access to this article.

Get full text

Darwin's abominable mystery: Insights from a supertree of the angiosperms

513Citations
802Readers
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

An introduction to phylosymbiosis

167Citations
287Readers

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bogdanowicz, D., & Giaro, K. (2013). On a matching distance between rooted phylogenetic trees. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, 23(3), 669–684. https://doi.org/10.2478/amcs-2013-0050

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 26

76%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

18%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Researcher 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20

65%

Computer Science 5

16%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 3

10%

Environmental Science 3

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0