P2707Optimal timing of invasive strategy in stable non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: impact of immediate intervention

  • Sim D
  • Jeong M
  • Ahn Y
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The optimal timing of intervention in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) remains controversial. We sought to assess impact of immediate percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and optimal PCI timing for stable NSTEMI. Methods: A total of 6,134 NSTEMI patients undergoing PCI from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry were divided into group 1 (immediate PCI within 4 hours, n=1,132) and group 2 (deferred PCI after 4 hours, n=5,002). Patients with recurrent or refractory ischemia, systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg, Killip class ≥3, ventricular arrhythmia, cardiac arrest, or mechanical complications were excluded. Propensity-matched 12-month clinical outcome was compared between the groups and according to time to PCI. Results: In all patients and propensity-matched cohort (n=1,131 in each group), group 1 had higher peak troponin level, higher rate of pre-PCI Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade 0 or 1, higher use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, and lower use of unfractionated heparin and nitrates. In all patients, 12- month rates of MI and death/MI were higher in group 1. No differences were observed in 12-month death and major adverse cardiac events (MACE: composite of death, MI, target-vessel revascularization, and coronary artery bypass graft surgery). In the propensity-matched cohort, no significant differences were observed in 12-month rates of death, MI, death/MI or MACE. However, group 1 had less major bleeding (0.8% vs. 3.0%, p=0.024) and shorter hospital stay. In the propensity-matched cohort, the effect of PCI on 12-month outcome showed a Ushaped relationship with longer time to PCI: rates of MI and death/MI according to time to PCI (≤4 hours, 4-12 hours, 12-24 hours, 24-72 hours, >72 hours after arrival) were 2.7%, 1.3%, 1.1%, 1.9%, 2.2% and 6.5%, 4.2%, 3.9%, 5.2%, 6.1%, respectively. PCI 4-12 hours and 12-24 hours after arrival was associated with lower risk of 12-month MI (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25 to 0.93, p=0.03 and HR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.72, p=0.002) and death/MI (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.93, p=0.02 and HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.84, p=0.003), respectively. Conclusions: Immediate PCI for stable NSTEMI did not confer an advantage with respect to hard clinical endpoints at 12 months. PCI within 4-24 hours after arrival was associated with lower risk of adverse events.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sim, D. S., Jeong, M. H., Ahn, Y. K., Kim, Y. J., Chae, S. C., Hong, T. J., … Park, S. J. (2017). P2707Optimal timing of invasive strategy in stable non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: impact of immediate intervention. European Heart Journal, 38(suppl_1). https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx502.p2707

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free