LHS-based hybrid microdata VS rank swapping and microaggregation for numeric microdata protection

35Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In previous work by Domingo-Ferrer et al., rank swapping and multivariate microaggregation has been identified as well-performing masking methods for microdata protection. Recently, Dandekar et al. proposed using synthetic microdata, as an option, in place of original data by using Latin hypercube sampling (LHS) technique. The LHS method focuses on mimicking univariate as well as multivariate statistical characteristics of original data. The LHS-based synthetic data does not allow one to one comparison with original data. This prevents estimating the overall information loss by using current measures. In this paper we utilize unique features of LHS method to create hybrid data sets and evaluate their performance relative to rank swapping and multivariate microaggregation using generalized information loss and disclosure risk measures.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dandekar, R. A., Domingo-Ferrer, J., & Sebé, F. (2002). LHS-based hybrid microdata VS rank swapping and microaggregation for numeric microdata protection. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 2316, pp. 153–162). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47804-3_12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free