Current issues in qualitative data analysis software (QDAS): A user and developer perspective

33Citations
Citations of this article
75Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper describes recent issues and developments in Qualitative Data Analysis Software (QDAS) as presented in the opening plenary at the KWALON 2016 conference. From a user perspective, it reflects current features and functionality, including the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning; implications of the cloud; user friendliness; the role of digital archives; and the development of a common exchange format. This user perspective is complemented with the views of software developers who took part in the “Rotterdam Exchange Format Initiative,” an outcome of the conference.

References Powered by Scopus

From guided-instruction to facilitation of learning: the development of Five-level QDA as a CAQDAS pedagogy that explicates the practices of expert users

30Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Designing and developing cell phone applications for qualitative research

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Automated text analysis to examine qualitative differences in safety schema among upper managers, supervisors and workers

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Building Transparency and Trustworthiness in Inductive Research Through Computer-Aided Qualitative Data Analysis Software

99Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cody: An ai-based system to semi-automate coding for qalitative research

36Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Computational Thematic Analysis Toolkit

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Evers, J. C. (2018). Current issues in qualitative data analysis software (QDAS): A user and developer perspective. Qualitative Report, 23(13), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3205

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 29

58%

Researcher 10

20%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

12%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 15

48%

Computer Science 7

23%

Business, Management and Accounting 5

16%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free