Abstract
We propose ASPIC-END, an adaptation of the structured argumentation framework ASPIC+ which can incorporate explanations and natural deduction style arguments. We discuss an instantiation of ASPIC-END that models argumentation about explanations of semantic paradoxes (e.g. the Liar paradox), and we show that ASPIC-END satisfies rationality postulates akin to those satisfied by ASPIC+.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Dauphin, J., & Cramer, M. (2018). ASPIC-END: Structured argumentation with explanations and natural deduction. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 10757 LNAI, pp. 51–66). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75553-3_4
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
