This chapter will describe the main theoretical approaches and literature necessary for the interpretation of the remaining chapters. It explores peer review as a group-led process, and examines what this means for the evaluation of ambiguous objects such as Impact. I also use this chapter to introduce the concept of a dominant definition, providing much of the necessary discourse for the development of this book’s theories and interpretations.
CITATION STYLE
Derrick, G. (2018). Peer Review of Impact: Could It Work? In The Evaluators’ Eye (pp. 21–55). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63627-6_2
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.