Peer Review of Impact: Could It Work?

  • Derrick G
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter will describe the main theoretical approaches and literature necessary for the interpretation of the remaining chapters. It explores peer review as a group-led process, and examines what this means for the evaluation of ambiguous objects such as Impact. I also use this chapter to introduce the concept of a dominant definition, providing much of the necessary discourse for the development of this book’s theories and interpretations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Derrick, G. (2018). Peer Review of Impact: Could It Work? In The Evaluators’ Eye (pp. 21–55). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63627-6_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free