Efficiency of different selection criteria for persistency and lactation milk yield

37Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A conversion formula was developed to convert the genetic covariance matrices of daily yields and of random regression coefficients between 305-d and 335-d production periods under a random regression test day model. Five selection criteria were compared in terms of genetic improvement in persistency and lactation milk: 1) lactation estimated breeding value (EBVL), 2) P6 = (Equation Presented) (D280 - Di), 3) ratio of daily estimated breeding value (EBV)(r280/65 = D280/D 65), 4) ratio of partial lactation EBV (P280/65 = D 66-280/D5-65), and 5) differential daily EBV (d 65-280 = D65 - D280), where Di refers to EBV at days in milk (DIM) i. Fundamental differences among these 5 selection criteria were interpreted conceptually with a graph. Persistency, defined as k = (ΔG65 - ΔG280)/215, was the average daily rate of decline in selection gain from DIM 65 to 280, which is free from the effect of lactation milk on the rate of decline. Parameter k provides an objective measure of persistency, which increases when k < 0 and decreases when k > 0. Of the 5 selection criteria compared, d 65-280 and P6 achieved greater persistency at the expense of genetic gain in lactation milk, whereas selection based on EBVL achieved the highest response in lactation milk, but was coupled with greatest decline in persistency. Selection on P280/65 or r280/65 improved both lactation milk and persistency and, thus, is recommended for simultaneous improvement of these 2 economically important traits. Further study of the relative economic values of persistency and lactation milk in order to combine both traits into an index for selection decision is warranted.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Togashi, K., & Lin, C. Y. (2004). Efficiency of different selection criteria for persistency and lactation milk yield. Journal of Dairy Science, 87(5), 1528–1535. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73304-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free