Research methods in economics and its implications for capital formation

3Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We explore whether public or private capital augments or obstruct Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) inflows by decomposing Domestic Capital Formation (DCF) into private and public capital formation. To this end, we apply Cross-Sectional Autoregressive Distributed Lags (CS-ARDL) approach to analyze panel time-series data. Our empirical results show that public capital crowds in FDI inflows while private capital crowds out FDI inflows. However, institutional quality significantly attracts FDI inflows for less developing economies. We argue that private and public capital possess different attributes; thus, clubbing them together might result in aggregation bias. We observe a strong connection of good institutional quality with private and public capital to augment foreign capital inflows for developing countries in the long run. Besides, our empirical results suggest that returns are high with quality institutions, especially for developing regions. Our result estimations provide several policy implications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ameer, W., Xu, H., Sohag, K., Halwan, M. M., & Amin, A. (2022). Research methods in economics and its implications for capital formation. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja , 35(1), 5536–5555. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2030244

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free