Validity and reliability of measures to assess constructs from the inner setting domain of the consolidated framework for implementation research in a pediatric clinic network implementing HPV programs

19Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Accurate and valid measures for implementation constructs are critical to advance research and guide implementation efforts. However, there is a continued need for valid and reliable measures for implementation research. The purpose of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of measures for the Inner Setting domain of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) in a network of pediatric clinics. Methods: This study used cross-sectional survey data collected from physicians, advanced practice providers, clinic managers, and clinical staff (n = 546) working in a pediatric clinic network (n = 51). Surveys included measures assessing Inner Setting constructs from CFIR (culture, learning climate, leadership engagement, and available resources). We used a series multilevel confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models to assess factorial validity. We also examined measure correlations to test discriminant validity and intraclass correlation coefficients, ICC(1) and ICC(2), to assess inter-rater reliability. Results: Factor loadings were high (≥0.60) for all but one of the measurement items. Most CFA models for respective constructs demonstrated adequate or good model fit (CFI > 0.90, TLI > 0.90, RMSEA< 0.08, and SRMR< 0.08). The measures also demonstrated good discriminant validity (correlations< 0.90) aside from some evidence of overlap between leadership engagement and learning climate at the clinic level (0.91). The ICC(1) values ranged from 0.05-0.16 while the ICC(2) values ranged from 0.34-0.67. Conclusions: The measures demonstrated good validity and adequate reliability with the exception of available resources, which had some evidence of lower than desired reliability and validity at the clinic level. Our findings extend previous work by providing additional psychometric evidence to support the use of these Inner Setting measures in pediatric clinics implementing human papillomavirus programs.

References Powered by Scopus

Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

85595Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science

9685Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis

4382Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Barriers and facilitators to knowledge translation activities within academic institutions in low- And middle-income countries

35Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measuring implementation: Development of the implementation process assessment tool (IPAT)

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Centralized colorectal cancer screening outreach and patient navigation for vulnerable populations in North Carolina: study protocol for the SCORE randomized controlled trial

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Walker, T. J., Rodriguez, S. A., Vernon, S. W., Savas, L. S., Frost, E. L., & Fernandez, M. E. (2019). Validity and reliability of measures to assess constructs from the inner setting domain of the consolidated framework for implementation research in a pediatric clinic network implementing HPV programs. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4021-5

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 28

80%

Researcher 4

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

6%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 10

32%

Medicine and Dentistry 9

29%

Nursing and Health Professions 7

23%

Psychology 5

16%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free