Transplant International Official Journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In the past, extravesical ureteroneocystostomy has been technically modified several times, with varying results. In this study, we evaluate our experience with modified extravesical re-implantation and routine stenting. From January 1988 to September 2001, 411 consecutive renal transplantations (220 LRD/LUD, 191 CAD) were performed at our institutions. Of 220 kidneys utilized for living related transplantation, 39 were retrieved laparoscopically and 181 were retrieved by open nephrectomy. The ureteroneocystostomy performed was a modified Lich-Gregoir re-implantation with routine stenting, using the upper transplant ureter. A double ureter was encountered in 11 patients and was managed with a conjoint ureteral ostium-to-mucosa anastomosis, using two stents. In two patients with graft ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) stenosis, a double ipsilateral drainage was performed, applying modified extravesical reimplantation with concomitant ureteroneocystostomy. There were no ureteral leaks. Five (1.22%) patients developed temporary ureterovesical junction (UVJ) obstruction/edema following stent removal, which necessitated restenting for 4-6 weeks. Two patients (0.49%) developed delayed stenosis and were successfully treated with retrograde balloon dilatation.(One at the UPJ of a pediatric kidney, and one at UVJ). All patients with functioning grafts in this series are currently stent-free. We conclude that the modified extravesical reimplantation with routine stenting is an effective and safe technique in renal transplantation, associated with almost no complications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Transplant International Official Journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation. (1992). Transplant International Official Journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77423-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free