Validity and Problem-Based Learning Research: A Review of Instruments Used to Assess Intended Learning Outcomes

  • Belland B
  • French B
  • Ertmer P
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
228Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Problem-based learning (PBL) spread from the medical school to other university and K-12 contexts due, in part, to the stated promise that PBL produces the target outcomes of deep content learning, increased problem-solving ability, and increased self-directed learning (Hmelo-Silver, 2004). However, research results have been unclear. This paper examines how the three target outcomes of PBL were measured in 33 empirical studies. Results indicate that few studies included 1) theoretical frameworks for the assessed vari-ables and constructs, 2) rationales for how chosen assessments matched the constructs measured, or 3) other information required for readers to assess the validity of authors' interpretations. Implications for future research are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Belland, B. R., French, B. F., & Ertmer, P. A. (2009). Validity and Problem-Based Learning Research: A Review of Instruments Used to Assess Intended Learning Outcomes. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1059

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free