Comparative analysis of content-based and context-based similarity on musical data

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Similarity measurement between two musical pieces is a hard problem. Humans perceive such similarity by employing a large amount of contextually semantic information. Commonly used content-based me-thodologies rely on information that includes little or no semantic information, and thus are reaching a performance "upper bound". Recent research pertaining to contextual information assigned as free-form text (tags) in social networking services has indicated tags to be highly effective in improving the accuracy of music similarity. In this paper, we perform a large scale (20k real music data) similarity measurement using mainstream content and context methodologies. In addition, we test the accuracy of the examined methodologies against not only objective metadata but real-life user listening data as well. Experimental results illustrate the conditionally substantial gains of the context-based methodologies and a not so close match these methods with the real user listening data similarity. © 2011 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boletsis, C., Gratsani, A., Chasanidou, D., Karydis, I., & Kermanidis, K. (2011). Comparative analysis of content-based and context-based similarity on musical data. In IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology (Vol. 364 AICT, pp. 179–189). Springer New York LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23960-1_22

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free