Factor V Leiden related Budd-Chiari syndrome

148Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background - The role of factor V Leiden as a cause of Budd-Chiari syndrome has only recently been described. Aims - To assess the specific features of factor V Leiden related Budd-Chiari syndrome. Patients - Sixty three consecutive patients with hepatic vein or terminal inferior vena cava thrombosis. Methods - Standardised chart review. Results - Factor V Leiden was found in 20 patients (31% (95% CI 20-43)). In the subgroup of patients with, compared with the subgroup without, factor V Leiden, a combination of prothrombotic states was more common (70% (95% CI 50-90) ν 14% (95% CI 3-24)); inferior vena cava thrombosis was more frequent (40% (95% CI 19-61) ν 7% (95% CI 0-14)); and distribution of initial alanine aminotransferase values was bimodal (almost normal or extremely increased) versus unimodal (p=0.003). Factor V Leiden accounted for four of five cases of massive ischaemic necrosis (transaminases >50-fold the upper limit of normal values) (p=0.014), and also for all three cases developing during pregnancy. Patients with and without factor V Leiden did not differ with regard to mortality, portosytemic shunting, or listing for liver transplantation. Hepatocellular carcinoma developed in two patients; both had factor V Leiden and indolent obstruction of the inferior vena cava. Conclusions - In patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome, factor V Leiden (a) is common; (b) precipitates thrombosis mostly when combined with another risk factor; (c) is associated with one of two contrasting clinical pictures: indolent thrombosis - particularly of the inferior vena cava - or massive ischaemic necrosis; and (d) is a major cofactor of Budd-Chiari syndrome developing during pregnancy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Deltenre, P., Hillaire, S., Erlinger, S., Valla, D. C., Denninger, M. H., Guillin, M. C., … Casadevall, N. (2001). Factor V Leiden related Budd-Chiari syndrome. Gut, 48(2), 264–268. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.48.2.264

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free