Emerging Powers, Global Justice and International Economic Law: Reformers of an Unjust Order?

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The book assesses emerging powers' influence on international economic law and analyses whether their rhetoric of reforming this 'unjust' order translates into concrete reforms. The questions at the heart of the book surround the extent to which Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa individually and as a bloc (BRICS) provide alternative regulatory ideas to those of 'Western' States and whether they are able to convert their increased power into influence on global regulation. To do so, the book investigates two broader case studies, namely, the reform of international investment agreements and WTO reform negotiations since the start of the Doha Development Round. As a general outcome, it finds that emerging powers do not radically challenge established law. 'Third World' rhetoric mostly does not translate into practice and rather serves to veil economic interests. Still, emerging powers provide for some alternative regulatory ideas, already leading to a diversification of international economic law. As a general rule, they tend to support norms that allow host States much policy space which could be used to protect and fulfil socio-economic human rights, especially - but not only - in the Global South.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Buser, A. (2021). Emerging Powers, Global Justice and International Economic Law: Reformers of an Unjust Order? Emerging Powers, Global Justice and International Economic Law: Reformers of an Unjust Order? (pp. 1–423). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63639-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free