Ptosis surgery: Comparing different surgical techniques

1Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Surgical techniques for the treatment of ptosis are varied, presenting the surgeon with a complex repertoire of options. The treatment plan should be best matched to each individual case, based on the etiology, severity of the ptosis, levator function, and surgeon's experience. Therefore familiarity with the different surgical techniques, their indications, advantages, and disadvantages may help the surgeon in making the best clinical decision. This chapter reviews the clinical outcome data in ptosis surgery based on comparative studies, comparing different surgical techniques, such as levator resection vs. Müller's muscle resection vs. Fasanella-Servat for involutional ptosis, frontalis suspension via autogenous fascia vs. banked fascia vs. an alloplastic material (silicone, Gortex, and Supramyd) for poor levator function ptosis, and levator resection vs. frontalis suspension for congenital ptosis. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Skaat, A., & Ben Simon, G. J. (2011). Ptosis surgery: Comparing different surgical techniques. In Evaluation and Management of Blepharoptosis (pp. 263–268). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-92855-5_28

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free