Behavioral Health Professionals' Perceptions on Patient-Controlled Granular Information Sharing (Part 1): Focus Group Study

3Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Patient-controlled granular information sharing (PC-GIS) allows a patient to select specific health information “granules,” such as diagnoses and medications; choose with whom the information is shared; and decide how the information can be used. Previous studies suggest that health professionals have mixed or concerned opinions about the process and impact of PC-GIS for care and research. Further understanding of behavioral health professionals' views on PC-GIS are needed for successful implementation and use of this technology. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in health professionals' opinions on PC-GIS before and after a demonstrative case study. Methods: Four focus groups were conducted at two integrated health care facilities: one serious mental illness facility and one general behavioral health facility. A total of 28 participants were given access to outcomes of a previous study where patients had control over medical record sharing. Participants were surveyed before and after focus groups on their views about PC-GIS. Thematic analysis of focus group output was paired with descriptive statistics and exploratory factor analysis of surveys. Results: Behavioral health professionals showed a significant opinion shift toward concern after the focus group intervention, specifically on the topics of patient understanding (P = .001), authorized electronic health record access (P = .03), patient-professional relationship (P = .006), patient control acceptance (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ivanova, J., Tang, T., Idouraine, N., Murcko, A., Whitfield, M. J., Dye, C., … Grando, A. (2022). Behavioral Health Professionals’ Perceptions on Patient-Controlled Granular Information Sharing (Part 1): Focus Group Study. JMIR Mental Health, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.2196/21208

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free