The intra- and inter-rater reliability of an instrumented spasticity assessment in children with cerebral palsy

27Citations
Citations of this article
148Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim: Despite the impact of spasticity, there is a lack of objective, clinically reliable and valid tools for its assessment. This study aims to evaluate the reliability of various performance- and spasticity-related parameters collected with a manually controlled instrumented spasticity assessment in four lower limb muscles in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Method: The lateral gastrocnemius, medial hamstrings, rectus femoris and hip adductors of 12 children with spastic CP (12.8 years, ±4.13 years, bilateral/unilateral involvement n=7/5) were passively stretched in the sagittal plane at incremental velocities. Muscle activity, joint motion, and torque were synchronously recorded using electromyography, inertial sensors, and a force/torque load-cell. Reliability was assessed on three levels: (1) intra- and (2) interrater within session, and (3) intra-rater between session. Results: Parameters were found to be reliable in all three analyses, with 90% containing intra-class correlation coefficients >0.6, and 70% of standard error of measurement values <20% of the mean values. The most reliable analysis was intra-rater within session, followed by intra-rater between session, and then inter-rater within session. The Adds evaluation had a slightly lower level of reliability than that of the other muscles. Conclusions: Limited intrinsic/extrinsic errors were introduced by repeated stretch repetitions. The parameters were more reliable when the same rater, rather than different raters performed the evaluation. Standardisation and training should be further improved to reduce extrinsic error when different raters perform the measurement. Errors were also muscle specific, or related to the measurement set-up. They need to be accounted for, in particular when assessing pre-post interventions or longitudinal follow-up. The parameters of the instrumented spasticity assessment demonstrate a wide range of applications for both research and clinical environments in the quantification of spasticity.

References Powered by Scopus

Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability

19207Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity

4422Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM

4110Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Is one trial sufficient to obtain excellent pressure pain threshold reliability in the low back of asymptomatic individuals? A test-retest study

76Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Spasticity measurement based on tonic stretch reflex threshold in children with cerebral palsy using the pediAnklebot

39Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Reliability of a clinical 3D freehand ultrasound technique: Analyses on healthy and pathological muscles

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schless, S. H., Desloovere, K., Aertbeliën, E., Molenaers, G., Huenaerts, C., & Bar-On, L. (2015). The intra- and inter-rater reliability of an instrumented spasticity assessment in children with cerebral palsy. PLoS ONE, 10(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131011

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 69

73%

Researcher 14

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 27

36%

Nursing and Health Professions 21

28%

Engineering 20

26%

Sports and Recreations 8

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 51

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free