The adoption of bitcoins technology: The difference between perceived future expectation and intention to use bitcoins: Does social influence matter?

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
81Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Bitcoin is a decentralized system that tries to become a solution to the shortcomings of fiat and gold-based currencies. Considering its newness, the adoption level of bitcoin is yet understood. Hence, several variables are proposed in this work in examining user perceptions regarding performance expectancy, effort expectancy, trust, adoption risk, decentralization and social influence interplay, with the context of user's future expectation and behavioral intentions to use bitcoins. Data were gathered from 293 completed questionnaire and analised using AMOS 18. The outcomes prove the sound predictability of the proposed model regarding user's future expectations and intentions toward bitcoins. All hypotheses were supported, they were significantly affecting the dependent variables. Social influence was found as the highest predictor of behavioral intention to negatively utilize bitcoins. The significant impact of social influence, adoption risk and effort expectancy which affect behavioral intention to use bitcoins the most, are demonstrated in this study. Bitcoins should thus, present an effective, feasible and personalized program which will assist efficient usage among users. Additionally, the impacts of social influence, adoption risk and perceived trust on behavioral intention to utilize new technology were compared, and their direct path was tested together, for the first time in this context.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Almarashdeh, I., Eldaw, K. E., Alsmadi, M., Alghamdi, F., Jaradat, G., Althunibat, A., … Mohammad, R. M. A. (2021). The adoption of bitcoins technology: The difference between perceived future expectation and intention to use bitcoins: Does social influence matter? International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 11(6), 5351–5366. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v11i6.pp5351-5366

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 10

48%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

19%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 13

52%

Computer Science 6

24%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4

16%

Social Sciences 2

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free