Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of University Licensing: A survey of major U.S. Universities

471Citations
Citations of this article
222Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper describes results of our survey of licensing at 62 research universities. We consider ownership, income splits, stage of development, marketing, license policies and characteristics, goals of licensing and the role of the inventor in licensing. Based on these results we analyze the relationship between licensing outcomes and both the objectives of the TTO and the characteristics of the technologies. Patent applications grow one-to-one with disclosures, while sponsored research grows similarly with licenses executed. Royalties are typically larger the higher the quality of the faculty and the higher the fraction of licenses that are executed at latter stages of development. Sponsored research is more likely to be included in a license if the new technology is at an early stage of development or if the TTO evaluates it as important. We find that additional disclosures generate smaller percentage increases in licenses, and those increases in licenses generate smaller percentage increases in royalties. © 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thursby, J. G., Jensen, R., & Thursby, M. C. (2001). Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of University Licensing: A survey of major U.S. Universities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1–2), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007884111883

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free