Operant matching is not a logical consequence of maximizing reinforcement rate

115Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The distribution of behavior between concurrently available schedules of reinforcement approximates the distribution of reinforcements between the schedules. This equality, called matching, has been explained as an instance of the principle that organisms maximize reinforcement rate. However, a precise account of the relationship between the distribution of behavior and reinforcement rate on the standard concurrent schedule shows that matching and maximizing are different. © 1979 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Heyman, G. M., & Luce, R. D. (1979). Operant matching is not a logical consequence of maximizing reinforcement rate. Animal Learning & Behavior, 7(2), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209261

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free