Effect of a proficiency-based progression simulation programme on clinical communication for the deteriorating patient: A randomised controlled trial

33Citations
Citations of this article
199Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of a proficiency-based progression (PBP) training approach to clinical communication in the context of a clinically deteriorating patient. Design: This is a randomised controlled trial with three parallel arms. Setting: This study was conducted in a university in Ireland. Participants: This study included 45 third year nursing and 45 final year medical undergraduates scheduled to undertake interdisciplinary National Early Warning Score (NEWS) training over a 3-day period in September 2016. Interventions: Participants were prospectively randomised to one of three groups before undertaking a performance assessment of the ISBAR (Identification, Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) communication tool relevant to a deteriorating patient in a high-fidelity simulation facility. The groups were as follows: (i) E, the Irish Health Service national NEWS e-learning programme only; (ii) E+S, the national e-learning programme plus standard simulation; and (iii) E+PBP, the national e-learning programme plus PBP simulation. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the proportion in each group reaching a predefined proficiency benchmark comprising a series of predefined steps, errors and critical errors during the performance of a standardised, high-fidelity simulation assessment case which was recorded and scored by two independent blinded assessors. Results: 6.9% (2/29) of the E group and 13% (3/23) of the E+S group demonstrated proficiency in comparison to 60% (15/25) of the E+PBP group. The difference between the E and the E+S groups was not statistically significant (χ2 =0.55, 99% CI 0.63 to 0.66, p=0.63) but was significant for the difference between the E and the E+PBP groups (χ2 =22.25, CI 0.00 to 0.00, p<0.000) and between the E+S and the E+PBP groups (χ2 =11.04, CI 0.00 to 0.00, p=0.001). Conclusions: PBP is a more effective way to teach clinical communication in the context of the deteriorating patient than e-learning either alone or in combination with standard simulation.

References Powered by Scopus

Virtual reality training improves operating room performance results of a randomized, double-blinded study

2306Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The quality in Australian health care study

1961Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Changes in medical errors after implementation of a handoff program

629Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on the Impact of Proficiency-based Progression Simulation Training on Performance Outcomes

71Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Objective assessment of intraoperative skills for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP): results from the ERUS Scientific and Educational Working Groups Metrics Initiative

43Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Orsi Consensus Meeting on European Robotic Training (OCERT): Results from the First Multispecialty Consensus Meeting on Training in Robot-assisted Surgery

42Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Breen, D., O’Brien, S., McCarthy, N., Gallagher, A., & Walshe, N. (2019). Effect of a proficiency-based progression simulation programme on clinical communication for the deteriorating patient: A randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open, 9(7). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025992

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 45

54%

Lecturer / Post doc 16

19%

Researcher 14

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 51

52%

Medicine and Dentistry 35

35%

Social Sciences 9

9%

Engineering 4

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free