Seaglider Surveys at Ocean Station Papa: Oxygen Kinematics and Upper-Ocean Metabolism

13Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Understanding variability in annual net community production (NCP) and factors affecting its estimation are important priorities for the study of ocean biogeochemistry. The time evolution of dissolved oxygen is useful proxy for NCP if the physical tendency can be isolated and removed; a key challenge is the resolution of the terms contributing to this tendency. Here oxygen balances are examined in the upper 200 m at Ocean Station Papa (50°N, 145°W) using data from Seaglider surveys June 2008 to January 2010. Sampling of horizontal gradients of oxygen, temperature, and salinity during these surveys allows the inference of monthly three-dimensional advection and turbulent diffusion of oxygen. The resulting monthly oxygen balances show strong variability with depth, with similarities to the temperature balances shallower than 100 m and salinity balances deeper. The estimated annual NCP of 2.2 ± 1.2 mol C·m−2·year−1 in the top 120 m is in agreement with contemporary studies in the subarctic North Pacific Ocean. Horizontal advection in the surface layer is found to be small as previously assumed but important at greater depths: Assuming zero horizontal advection in the top 120 m would have resulted in an overestimate of annual NCP by 50%. Horizontal and vertical advection together dominated the oxygen balance in the permanent pycnocline. Results emphasize the three-dimensional nature of the oxygen balance, even in this relatively quiescent location, and further demonstrate the viability of autonomous spatial surveys for resolving physical oxygen transport terms.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pelland, N. A., Eriksen, C. C., Emerson, S. R., & Cronin, M. F. (2018). Seaglider Surveys at Ocean Station Papa: Oxygen Kinematics and Upper-Ocean Metabolism. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 123(9), 6408–6427. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014091

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free