Identifying a Research Gap in Indonesian Governance

  • Susanti N
  • Amalia S
  • Rachmawati T
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

One of the major challenges in crafting research is highlighting the novelty and the contribution of that research. Therefore, understanding what has been studied and the progress made in a particular topic is essential before embarking on a research journey. This study was a bibliometric analysis that aimed to collect and analyze bibliographic data from articles, journals and other publications on the topic of governance in Indonesia. Three applications were used: Public or Perish, VOS viewer and Mendeley. 1000 articles published in academic journals from 2015 to 2020 were collected and reviewed. The findings suggested that topics such as transparency, service and quality have been over-researched. On the contrary, topics such as impact, procedure, organization and good government still offer wider opportunities to be researched. It is recommended that any researchers wanting to study governance in Indonesia consider these under-researched topics. Keywords: overnance, Indonesia, resistance, bibliometric analysis, public service

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Susanti, N. S., Amalia, S. S., Rachmawati, T., Parulian Simanjuntak, J. G. G., Trianita M.R.H, D., & Manuel, A. (2022). Identifying a Research Gap in Indonesian Governance. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i9.10951

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free