The Fallacy of the Transgender Skeleton

4Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Gender variance is likely a cross-cultural phenomenon with deep antiquity that bioarchaeological data can document effectively. Yet, recent reports that have gone viral in mediascapes, the “transsexual” cavemen being one pointed example discussed in this chapter, should give investigators pause. That is, describing ancient socio-sexual lives as such complicates normative notions about the body, gender, and sexuality, but the designation is a fallacy since these terms are modern Western inventions. The use of trans- more generally to describe identities or experiences in the bioarchaeological record points to effacement of recent sociopolitical processes, as well as a disregard for dimensions of sex/gender systems that are contingent and dynamic.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Geller, P. L. (2019). The Fallacy of the Transgender Skeleton. In Bioarchaeology and Social Theory (pp. 231–242). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93012-1_10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free