The Philippines’ COVID-19 Response: Securitising the Pandemic and Disciplining the Pasaway

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
204Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The Philippine response to COVID-19 has been described as being one of the longest and strictest lockdowns in the world. Why has the Philippine government relied heavily on draconian measures in its “war” against COVID-19? And what discourse informed the framing of its response as a war against the virus? This article argues that the government’s reliance on draconian measures was a consequence of securitising COVID-19, appreciating the virus as an “existential threat.” The securitisation of COVID-19 was reinforced with a narrative characterising the situation of the country as being at war against an “unseen enemy.” This war-like narrative, however, invariably produced a subject, the pasaway. As the perpetual enemy of health and order, the pasaway became the target of disciplining and policing. The targeting of the pasaway was informed by deep-seated class prejudices and Duterte’s authoritarian tendencies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hapal, K. (2021). The Philippines’ COVID-19 Response: Securitising the Pandemic and Disciplining the Pasaway. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 40(2), 224–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1868103421994261

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free