Quoting is not Citing: Disentangling Affiliation and Interaction on Twitter

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Interaction networks are generally much less homophilic than affiliation networks, accommodating for many more cross-cutting links. By statistically assigning a political valence to users from their follower ties, and by further contrasting interaction and affiliation on Twitter (quotes and retweets) within specific discursive events, namely quote trees, we describe a variety of cross-cutting patterns which significantly nuance the traditional “echo chamber” narrative.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Roth, C., St-Onge, J., & Herms, K. (2022). Quoting is not Citing: Disentangling Affiliation and Interaction on Twitter. In Studies in Computational Intelligence (Vol. 1015, pp. 705–717). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93409-5_58

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free