Machine Learning-Based Classification of Pulmonary Diseases through Real-Time Lung Sounds

3Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The study presents a computer-based automated system that employs machine learning to classify pulmonary diseases using lung sound data collected from hospitals. Denoising techniques, such as discrete wavelet transform and variational mode decomposition, are applied to enhance classifier performance. The system combines cepstral features, such as Mel-frequency cepstrum coefficients and gammatone frequency cepstral coefficients, for classification. Four machine learning classifiers, namely the decision tree, k-nearest neighbor, linear discriminant analysis, and random forest, are compared. Evaluation metrics such as accuracy, recall, specificity, and f1 score are employed. This study includes patients affected by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, bronchiectasis, and healthy individuals. The results demonstrate that the random forest classifier outperforms the others, achieving an accuracy of 99.72% along with 100% recall, specificity, and f1 scores. The study suggests that the computer-based system serves as a decision-making tool for classifying pulmonary diseases, especially in resource-limited settings.

References Powered by Scopus

Trends in audio signal feature extraction methods

341Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An open access database for the evaluation of respiratory sound classification algorithms

206Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Deep Neural Network for Respiratory Sound Classification in Wearable Devices Enabled by Patient Specific Model Tuning

200Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Balasubramanian, S., & Rajadurai, P. (2024). Machine Learning-Based Classification of Pulmonary Diseases through Real-Time Lung Sounds. International Journal of Engineering and Technology Innovation, 14(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.46604/ijeti.2023.12294

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 4

57%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

29%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 3

43%

Computer Science 2

29%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

14%

Social Sciences 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free