GPU acceleration of finite difference schemes used in coupled electromagnetic/thermal field simulations

17Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The solution procedure of coupled electromagnetic-/thermal-simulations with high resolution requires efficient solvers. High performance computing libraries and languages like Nvidia's CUDA help in unlocking the massively parallel capabilities of GPUs to accelerate calculations. They reduce the time needed to solve real world problems. In this paper, the speed-up is discussed, which is obtained by using GPUs for coupled time domain simulations with finite difference schemes. A tailor-made implementation of the time consuming sparse matrix vector multiplication is shown to have advantages over standard CUDA-libraries like cuSparse. © 1965-2012 IEEE.

References Powered by Scopus

Numerical Solution of Initial Boundary Value Problems Involving Maxwell's Equations in Isotropic Media

13781Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Analysis of tissue and arterial blood temperatures in the resting human forearm

4982Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Virtual Family - Development of surface-based anatomical models of two adults and two children for dosimetric simulations

1294Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Parallel hybrid PSO with CUDA for lD heat conduction equation

71Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

GPU-based acceleration of computations in elasticity problems solving by parametric integral equations system

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Acceleration of integration in parametric integral equations system using CUDA

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Richter, C., Schops, S., & Clemens, M. (2013). GPU acceleration of finite difference schemes used in coupled electromagnetic/thermal field simulations. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 49(5), 1649–1652. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2013.2238662

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

79%

Researcher 2

14%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 6

43%

Computer Science 5

36%

Mathematics 2

14%

Physics and Astronomy 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0