Cost analysis of office-based transnasal esophagoscopy

12Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: Although office-based transnasal esophagoscopy has been investigated extensively, a cost analysis is still lacking. We performed a cost analysis combined with feasibility study for two diagnostic processes: patients with globus pharyngeus and/or dysphagia, and hypopharyngeal carcinoma. Methods: Prospective cohort study. Results: Forty-one procedures were performed, of which 35 were fully completed. The procedure was well tolerated with mild complaints such as nasal or pharyngeal pain and burping. Four complications occurred: two minor epistaxis and two vasovagal reactions. In patients with globus pharyngeus and/or dysphagia, transnasal esophagoscopy resulted in a cost saving of €94.43 (p 0.026) per procedure, compared to our regular diagnostic process. In patients with suspicion of hypopharyngeal carcinoma, cost savings were €831.41 (p 0.000) per case. Conclusions: Cost analysis showed that office-based transnasal esophagoscopy can provide significant cost savings for the current standard of care. Furthermore, this procedure resulted in good patient acceptability and few complications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wellenstein, D. J., Honings, J., Schutte, H. W., Herruer, J. M., van den Hoogen, F. J. A., Marres, H. A. M., … van den Broek, G. B. (2019). Cost analysis of office-based transnasal esophagoscopy. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 276(5), 1457–1463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05357-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free