Long-term trends in glioblastoma survival: Implications for historical control groups in clinical trials

14Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Historical controls continue to be used in early-phase brain tumor trials. We aim to show that historical changes in survival trends for glioblastoma (GBM) call into question the use of noncontemporary controls. Methods: We analyzed data from 46 106 primary GBM cases from the SEER database (1998-2016). We performed trend analysis on survival outcomes (2-year survival probability, median survival, and hazard ratios) and patient characteristics (age, sex, resection extent, and treatment type). Results: In 2005-2016 (ie, the post-Stupp protocol era), fitting a parameter independently to each year, there was a demonstrable increase in median survival (R2 = 0.81, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sheikh, S., Radivoyevitch, T., Barnholtz-Sloan, J. S., & Vogelbaum, M. (2020). Long-term trends in glioblastoma survival: Implications for historical control groups in clinical trials. Neuro-Oncology Practice, 7(2), 158–163. https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npz046

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free