The Scientists’ Role and Medical Innovations

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The chapter focuses on medicine and argues against the hasty dismissal of much of the classic sociology of science by a new generation of scholars. Ben-David tied the diffusion of disciplinary thought and innovation to his concept of the scientist’s role. Bacteriology and psychoanalysis served as examples. In both cases, a ‘role-hybridization’ was said to be instrumental in the move from the original disciplinary field to the new focus. The chapter explores this diffusion process on the basis of two examples: screening for cancer; and prenatal diagnosis. In both innovations, the impetus to develop these novelties did not originate with a specific group of scholars or professionals—and specifically not in their intent to transcend a constricting ‘role’, as Ben-David might have suggested. Rather the innovations came into being as the result of an interplay of various stakeholders.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Löwy, I. (2014). The Scientists’ Role and Medical Innovations. In Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science (Vol. 302, pp. 47–61). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7407-0_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free