Effects of ultrasonically activated irrigants with or without surfactant on smear layer removal after post space preparation

4Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of different NaOCl and EDTA formulations with/without ultrasonic use on smear layer removal and root canal surface characteristics after post space preparation. Study design: After post space preparations, forty-six teeth were subjected to different post space irrigation regimes; G1, 17% EDTA; G2, 17% EDTA+Ultrasonic activation; G3, EDTA-T; G4, EDTA-T+Ultrasonic activation; G5, NaOCl; G6, NaOCl+Ultrasonic activation. Specimens were examined under scanning electron microscope and scored for debris and smear layer removal and dentinal tubule opening and statistically analyzed with Kruskal Wallis and Dunn's test. Significance value was set at p<0.05. Results: EDTA and EDTA-T groups showed significantly better efficiency than the other groups in the each parts of the samples in terms of smear layer removal (p<0.05). In terms of dentinal tubule opening, EDTA, EDTA+Ultrasonic and EDTA-T groups had significantly better efficacy than the other groups in the middle and coronal parts of the samples (p<0.05). Conclusions: Ultrasonic activation did not significantly improve the efficiency of the irrigants. © Medicina Oral S. L. C.I.F. B 96689336 - eISSN: 1989-5488.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Turker, S. A., Yilmaz, Z., Ozcelik, B., Gorduysus, M., & Altundasar, E. (2012). Effects of ultrasonically activated irrigants with or without surfactant on smear layer removal after post space preparation. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.50835

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free