Impact of oral antimicrobial prophylaxis on surgical site infection and methicillin-resistantstaphylococcus aureus infection after elective colorectal surgery. Results of a prospective randomized trial

45Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The impact of oral antimicrobial prophylaxis on the surgical site infection and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection after elective colorectal surgery was evaluated by a prospective randomized single-blind study. The patients were randomly allocated to receive either mechanical bowel cleansing with polyethylene glycol alone (group 1) or mechanical cleansing plus oral antimicrobial prophylaxis with kanamycin and erythromycin for 2 days prior to surgery (group 2). In both groups, cefotiam was intravenously given twice a day for 3 days. A total of 143 patients (71 for group 1 and 72 for group 2) were eligible. The incidence of a surgical site infection was 23.9% in group 1 and 11.1% in group 2 (P = 0.04). The incidence of MRSA infection including at surgical and remote sites was 11.1% in group 1 and 5.6% in group 2 (P = 0.19). A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the risk of surgical site infection was influenced by the choice of the chemical bowel preparation (P = 0.03) and blood loss (P < 0.01), while an MRSA infection was predominantly influenced by blood loss (P < 0.01) followed by coexisting underlying diseases (P = 0.07). These results suggest that preoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis would be useful for reducing the incidence of a surgical site infection without increasing the risk of an MRSA infection following elective colorectal surgery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ishida, H., Yokoyama, M., Nakada, H., Inokuma, S., & Hashimoto, D. (2001). Impact of oral antimicrobial prophylaxis on surgical site infection and methicillin-resistantstaphylococcus aureus infection after elective colorectal surgery. Results of a prospective randomized trial. Surgery Today, 31(11), 979–983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005950170006

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free