The main aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of porosity, microstructure, and chemical composition on the wear and compressive strength of dental glass-ionomer or resin composite. Cylindrical samples (6 × 4 mm) were prepared from a nano-hybrid resin composite (Grandio®SO/RC, VOCO), a resin-modified glass ionomer (Vitremer™/VI, 3 M-ESPE) and a conventional glass ionomer (Ionofil®Molar/CO, VOCO). Porosity and topography of the materials were evaluated by optical and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Roughness was evaluated by Ra and Rt parameters at 0.1 mm/s under cut-off of 0.8 mm. Then, compressive tests were performed at 1 mm/min. Wear tests were carried out at 20 N, 2.5 mm of displacement, at 1 Hz for 90 min in artificial saliva solution. The results were statistically analyzed with a one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). Resin composite revealed a significantly lower porosity (1.21 ± 0.20 %) than glass-ionomer restoratives (5.69–7.54 %) as well as lower values of Ra and Rt roughness (p < 0.05). Also, resin composite showed significantly higher values of mechanical strength (334 ± 15.9 MPa) compared to conventional (78.78 ± 13.30 MPa) or modified glass ionomer (169.50 ± 20.98 MPa) (p < 0.05). For maximal depth of wear, resin composite also showed significantly lower values than glass ionomer (p < 0.05). Homogeneous wear morphology was noticed by SEM analyses on glass ionomers in opposition to resin composite. Glass ionomers showed a poor mechanical behavior associated to a high porosity and wear rate when compared to resin composite.
CITATION STYLE
Rodrigues, D. S., Buciumeanu, M., Martinelli, A. E., Nascimento, R. M., Henriques, B., Silva, F. S., & Souza, J. C. M. (2015). Mechanical Strength and Wear of Dental Glass-Ionomer and Resin Composites Affected by Porosity and Chemical Composition. Journal of Bio- and Tribo-Corrosion, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40735-015-0025-9
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.