Wave menus: Improving the novice mode of hierarchical marking menus

35Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We present Wave menus, a variant of multi-stroke marking menus designed for improving the novice mode of marking while preserving their efficiency in the expert mode of marking. Focusing on the novice mode, a criteria-based analysis of existing marking menus motivates the design of Wave menus. Moreover a user experiment is presented that compares four hierarchical marking menus in novice mode. Results show that Wave and compound-stroke menus are significantly faster and more accurate than multi-stroke menus in novice mode, while it has been shown that in expert mode the multi-stroke menus and therefore the Wave menus outperform the compound-stroke menus. Wave menus also require significantly less screen space than compound-stroke menus. As a conclusion, Wave menus offer the best performance for both novice and expert modes in comparison with existing multi-level marking menus, while requiring less screen space than compound-stroke menus. © IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2007.

Author supplied keywords

References Powered by Scopus

An empirical comparison of Pie vs. Linear menus

253Citations
148Readers
Get full text

User learning and performance with marking menus

217Citations
104Readers
136Citations
58Readers
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

StrikeAPose: Revealing mid-air gestures on public displays

148Citations
167Readers
Get full text
Get full text
68Citations
95Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bailly, G., Lecolinet, E., & Nigay, L. (2007). Wave menus: Improving the novice mode of hierarchical marking menus. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4662 LNCS, pp. 475–488). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74796-3_45

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘17‘18‘19‘21‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

77%

Researcher 5

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 24

86%

Design 2

7%

Social Sciences 1

4%

Engineering 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0