Meta-analysis of genetic association studies

133Citations
Citations of this article
153Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The object of this review is to help readers to understand meta-analysis of genetic association study. Genetic association studies are a powerful approach to identify susceptibility genes for common diseases. However, the results of these studies are not consistently reproducible. In order to overcome the limitations of individual studies, larger sample sizes or meta-analysis is required. Meta-analysis is a statistical tool for combining results of different studies on the same topic, thus increasing statistical strength and precision. Meta-analysis of genetic association studies combines the results from independent studies, explores the sources of heterogeneity, and identifies subgroups associated with the factor of interest. Meta-analysis of genetic association studies is an effective tool for garnering a greater understanding of complex diseases and potentially provides new insights into gene-disease associations.

References Powered by Scopus

Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

43172Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Meta-analysis in clinical trials

32970Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis

27198Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

An overview of meta-analysis for clinicians

203Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sugar-sweetened beverages consumption and the risk of depression: A meta-analysis of observational studies

130Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Fruit and Vegetables Consumption and Risk of Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis

124Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, Y. H. (2015). Meta-analysis of genetic association studies. Annals of Laboratory Medicine, 35(3), 283–287. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2015.35.3.283

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 61

66%

Researcher 20

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30

37%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 23

28%

Medicine and Dentistry 22

27%

Mathematics 6

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0