It is orthodox to suppose that very few, if any, nonhuman animals are persons. The category “person” is restricted to self-aware creatures: humans (above a certain age) and possibly some of the great apes and cetaceans. I argue that this orthodoxy should be rejected, because it rests on a mistaken conception of the kind of self-awareness relevant to personhood. Replacing this with a sense of self-awareness that is relevant requires us to accept that personhood is much more widely distributed through the animal kingdom.
CITATION STYLE
Rowlands, M. (2016). Are animals persons? Animal Sentience, 1(10). https://doi.org/10.51291/2377-7478.1110
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.