Purpose: To evaluate the effect of non-pharmacological interventions versus standard care on incidence and duration of delirium in critically ill patients. Methods: We searched electronic and grey literature for randomised clinical trials up to March 2018. Two reviewers independently screened, selected and extracted data. Meta-analysis was undertaken using random effects modelling. Results: We identified 15 trials (2812 participants). Eleven trials reported incidence of delirium. Pooled data from four trials of bright light therapy showed no significant effect between groups (n = 829 participants, RR 0.45, 99% CI 0.10–2.13, P = 0.19, very low quality evidence). Seven trials of various individual interventions also failed to report any significant effects. A total of eight trials reported duration of delirium. Pooled data from two trials of multicomponent physical therapy showed no significant effect [n = 404 participants, MD (days) − 0.65, 99% CI − 2.73 to 1.44, P = 0.42, low quality of evidence]. Four trials of various individual interventions also reported no significant effects. A trial of family voice reorientation showed a beneficial effect [n = 30, MD (days) − 1.30, 99% CI − 2.41 to − 0.19, P = 0.003, very low quality evidence]. Conclusions: Current evidence does not support the use of non-pharmacological interventions in reducing incidence and duration of delirium in critically ill patients. Future research should consider well-designed and well-described multicomponent interventions and include adequately defined outcome measures.
CITATION STYLE
Bannon, L., McGaughey, J., Verghis, R., Clarke, M., McAuley, D. F., & Blackwood, B. (2019, January 1). The effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in reducing the incidence and duration of delirium in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Medicine. Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5452-x
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.