Distant recurrence in breast cancer: Survival expectations and first choice of chemotherapy regimen

29Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Controversial questions in recurrent breast cancer include the magnitude of the survival benefit of combination chemotherapy and the best choice of first line chemotherapy. Data from the files of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG) show that with current systemic treatment median survival after distant recurrence is 19 months. Since historical data from the pre-chemotherapy era indicate a median survival of 12 months, the survival benefit of standard chemotherapy appears to be around 7 months in the average patient. The DBCG trial 80-R2 is the largest randomized trial of CAF (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil) versus CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) in recurrent breast cancer. A review of this study and 6 other similar studies shows that CAF is clearly superior to CMF in terms of better tumor shrinkage, prolonged overall time to progression, and decreased need of secondary therapy. The adverse effects of the two treatments are largely comparable, but CAF causes severe alopecia and is more expensive than CMF. On balance, the existing evidence indicates that CAF rather than CMF should be chosen as first line chemotherapy in recurrent breast cancer. ©1988 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brincker, H. (1988). Distant recurrence in breast cancer: Survival expectations and first choice of chemotherapy regimen. Acta Oncologica, 27(6), 729–732. https://doi.org/10.3109/02841868809091776

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free